4: 2017-01-20 (金) 02:43:25 msaito ソース 現: 2018-01-03 (水) 21:01:46 msaito ソース
Line 2: Line 2:
- Research Interests and current project - Research Interests and current project
-"''a wheat teacher''" vs "''a teacher wheat''".~+"''a serendipity teacher''" vs "''a pact bren''".~
Which do you feel more acceptable for an English word? Which do you feel more acceptable for an English word?
-My research interests are mainly in the comprehension process of language. While it has been widely accepted that frequency (counts in text corpora) is a good predictor for acceptability, it does not work well for the words in a lower band of frequency or even made-up words. The two examples above are both made-up nonsense words, but it seems there is difference in acceptability. What causes this asymmetry of acceptability? More generally, how do you understand the words that are new to you? These are my main interests.+My research interests are mainly in the comprehension process of language and the relationship between corpus frequency and acceptability given to linguistic expressions. Acceptability judgment seems to contribute a part of the comprehension process of language in general. Does it show the same characteristics as lexical decision task? What is shared and what is different? What aspects of the comprehension process does the difference suggest? Moreover, while it has been widely accepted that frequency (counts in text corpora) is a good predictor for acceptability, it is known that it does not work well for the words in a lower band of frequency or even made-up words. The two examples above are both made-up nonsense words, but it seems there is difference in acceptability. What causes this asymmetry of acceptability? More generally, how do you understand the words that are new to you? These are my main interests.
I am approaching this question using experimental methods in psycholinguistics. My current project focuses on the role of subschemas in the comprehension process, and I am doing some experiments to estimate the subschemas' influence. I am approaching this question using experimental methods in psycholinguistics. My current project focuses on the role of subschemas in the comprehension process, and I am doing some experiments to estimate the subschemas' influence.
Line 18: Line 18:
- Education - Education
--- 2016/11-present+-- 2017/06-2017/11 
 +--- The University of Tübingen, Germany; A visiting Ph.D. student. 
 +-- 2016/11-2017/01
--- The University of Sheffield, the UK; A visiting post-graduate researcher. --- The University of Sheffield, the UK; A visiting post-graduate researcher.
-- 2015-present -- 2015-present
Line 28: Line 30:
- Awards, Scholarships, and Grants - Awards, Scholarships, and Grants
---2017-2018: (scheduled)+--2017-2018:
---Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant ---Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant
----900,000JPY/year ----900,000JPY/year
Line 60: Line 62:
-- Presentations -- Presentations
---- Saito, Motoki. 2016. “Don’t mix them up!: Investigation in similar but different technical concepts that illuminate different assumptions about language” Presented at the workshop “What is necessary to make invisible language visible?”, the 17th Annual Meeting of Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan. (Talked in Japanese)+--- Saito, Motoki. 2016. “Language, linguistic knowledge, and linguistic ability: Similar but different technical concepts that illuminate different assumptions about '''language'''” Presented at the workshop “What is necessary to make invisible language visible?”, the 17th Annual Meeting of Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan. (Talked in Japanese)
--- Saito, Motoki. 2015. “Statistical Evaluation of the effect of Constructional Subschemas on Acceptability Judgment.” Presented at the 32th Annual Meeting of Japanese Cognitive Science Society, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. (Talked in Japanese) --- Saito, Motoki. 2015. “Statistical Evaluation of the effect of Constructional Subschemas on Acceptability Judgment.” Presented at the 32th Annual Meeting of Japanese Cognitive Science Society, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. (Talked in Japanese)
--- Saito, Motoki. 2015. “Statistical Assessment of the Effect of Semantic Concreteness on Acceptability Judgment.” Presented at the workshop “Exploration into the possibility of Methodological Research in Cognitive Linguistics: With Examples of Linguistic Methodological Studies”, the 16th Annual Meeting of Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan. (Talked in Japanese) --- Saito, Motoki. 2015. “Statistical Assessment of the Effect of Semantic Concreteness on Acceptability Judgment.” Presented at the workshop “Exploration into the possibility of Methodological Research in Cognitive Linguistics: With Examples of Linguistic Methodological Studies”, the 16th Annual Meeting of Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan. (Talked in Japanese)
Line 69: Line 71:
--- Saito, Motoki. 2013. Unified Cognitive Activation Model. Thesis submitted for the Minor Degree of Language and Speech Science, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. (Written in English) --- Saito, Motoki. 2013. Unified Cognitive Activation Model. Thesis submitted for the Minor Degree of Language and Speech Science, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. (Written in English)
-For more information, please see my complete CV, which you can find in [[my different website>https://sites.google.com/site/motokisaito8623/home/]].+For more information, please visit my webpages of [[ResearchGate>https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Motoki_Saito]] or [[Academia.edu>https://kyoto-u.academia.edu/MotokiSaito]].


トップ   差分 バックアップ 複製 名前変更 リロード   ページ新規作成 全ページ一覧 単語検索 最新ページの一覧   ヘルプ   最新ページのRSS 1.0 最新ページのRSS 2.0 最新ページのRSS Atom
Counter: 5253, today: 5, yesterday: 2